Environment
Conservation Journal

"An International Journal Devoted to Conservation of Environment"

(A PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)

ISSN: 2278-5124 (Online) :: ISSN: 0972-3099 (Print) ::

Enlisted in Clarivate Analytics (Formerly Thomson Reuters) Master Journal List

Enlisted in Index Copernicus Journal Master list

Environment
Conservation Journal

"An International Journal Devoted to Conservation of Environment"

(A PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)

ISSN: 2278-5124 (Online) :: ISSN: 0972-3099 (Print) ::

Enlisted in Clarivate Analytics (Formerly Thomson Reuters) Master Journal List

Enlisted in Index Copernicus Journal Master list

Environment
Conservation Journal

"An International Journal Devoted to Conservation of Environment"

(A PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)

ISSN: 2278-5124 (Online) :: ISSN: 0972-3099 (Print) ::

Enlisted in Clarivate Analytics (Formerly Thomson Reuters) Master Journal List

Enlisted in Index Copernicus Journal Master list

Environment
Conservation Journal

"An International Journal Devoted to Conservation of Environment"

(A PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)

ISSN: 2278-5124 (Online) :: ISSN: 0972-3099 (Print) ::

Enlisted in Clarivate Analytics (Formerly Thomson Reuters) Master Journal List

Enlisted in Index Copernicus Journal Master list

Environment
Conservation Journal

"An International Journal Devoted to Conservation of Environment"

(A PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL)

ISSN: 2278-5124 (Online) :: ISSN: 0972-3099 (Print) ::

Enlisted in Clarivate Analytics (Formerly Thomson Reuters) Master Journal List

Enlisted in Index Copernicus Journal Master list

previous arrow
next arrow
Slider

PEER REVIEW POLICY

Environment Conservation Journal (P-ISSN: 0972-3099, E-ISSN: 2278-5124) applies a single blind peer review policy. On receipt of paper, it is sent to a member of editorial board. After passing from member of Editorial board it is sent to specific subject referee for review. We follow single blind peer review method to maintain standards of quality improve performance and provide credibility. We believe that peer review is more relevant than ever as the system for evaluating the quality, validity, and relevance of scholarly research.
The author is communicated with available comments from the editor/ referee for corrections/ revision. After satisfactory report from editor/ referee, the paper is again reviewed by the Chief Editor for final acceptance of paper. The Journal respects the confidentiality of research hence we do not disclose any information regarding names of reviewer/ referee.
It is the duty of reviewer to treat any manuscripts received for review as confidential documents and they should not reveal any information about the correspondence and interactions with editors. They should not be shown or discussed or commented with third parties except the editor.